Your Rights in a Negligent Security Case in Arizona
If you were assaulted, robbed, or harmed by crime on someone else's property, what happened was not your fault. You may have the right to hold not only the attacker but also a property owner who failed to keep the place reasonably safe accountable.
More than one party can be responsible
The person who harmed you is responsible for the crime. But a property owner who ignored known dangers — and failed to provide reasonable security — may share responsibility for allowing it to happen. A claim against the owner is separate from any criminal case.
Your claim does not depend on the criminal case
You do not need charges or a conviction to bring a civil claim against a negligent owner. The two systems are separate and use different standards. Often it is the owner's insurance that can actually provide compensation for what you have been through.
How we help
We investigate the property's security and history, handle everything confidentially, and pursue accountability with respect for what you have been through. The review is free and confidential. Se habla español.
Frequently asked questions
Can I really sue a property owner for someone else’s crime?
Yes, where the owner should have foreseen the risk and failed to provide reasonable security. The attacker is responsible for the crime, and the owner may share responsibility for allowing a foreseeable danger to go unaddressed.
It happened a while ago. Is it too late?
Maybe not. Deadlines depend on the state and circumstances, and it is worth a confidential conversation before assuming it is too late.
Arizona law — what people ask
How long do I have to file an injury claim in Arizona?
Generally two years. But if a public entity is involved you must serve a formal notice of claim within 180 days and file suit within one year — and Arizona runs a much shorter one-year clock on dog-bite strict-liability claims specifically.
Can I still recover if I was partly at fault in Arizona?
Yes. Arizona applies pure comparative negligence, so fault reduces your recovery rather than ending the claim, and there is no percentage at which it cuts off. Arizona also treats fault questions as belonging to the jury rather than being resolved beforehand.
Does Arizona cap what I can recover?
No — and this sets Arizona apart from most states. Its constitution prohibits laws limiting damages for injury or death, and that applies to medical-malpractice claims too, where most states impose a cap. If you have read that pain and suffering is capped, that is not Arizona law.
What if more than one party was responsible?
Arizona generally applies several liability, so each responsible party answers for its own share rather than the whole judgment. That makes identifying every responsible party early a practical question about what is actually collectible.
The driver who hit me had no insurance. What now?
Your own uninsured or underinsured coverage is the usual route. Arizona also requires insurers to offer that coverage in writing — so if you were told your policy carries none, the underwriting file is worth checking before that answer is accepted.
Will the jury hear that my health insurance paid my bills?
Usually not — Arizona generally follows the collateral source rule. Medical-negligence cases are the statutory exception, where that evidence has been made admissible, which changes how medical damages are presented in those claims specifically.
Injury law in Arizona
Arizona injury law has some features that set it apart from its neighbors.
- Filing deadline: Arizona generally gives you two years from the injury to file, but only 180 days to serve a notice of claim on a public entity.
- Fault: Arizona follows pure comparative negligence — being partly, or even mostly, at fault reduces your recovery but does not bar it.
- Damage caps: Arizona is unusual: its constitution prohibits caps on injury or death damages, so a statutory cap does not limit what you can recover.
- Multiple defendants: Arizona generally applies several (not joint) liability, so each responsible party is accountable for its own share.
Related negligent security types
California injury law
This is general information about Arizona injury law, not legal advice. Every case is different.
Harmed by a crime that could have been prevented?
A quick, confidential review can tell you where you stand — about two minutes, no cost, no obligation.