Free, confidential case review — Call (866) 855-1195
Se habla espanolContact
Negligent Security · California

Your Rights in a Negligent Security Case in California

If you were assaulted, robbed, or harmed by crime on someone else's property, what happened was not your fault. You may have the right to hold not only the attacker but also a property owner who failed to keep the place reasonably safe accountable.

More than one party can be responsible

The person who harmed you is responsible for the crime. But a property owner who ignored known dangers — and failed to provide reasonable security — may share responsibility for allowing it to happen. A claim against the owner is separate from any criminal case.

Your claim does not depend on the criminal case

You do not need charges or a conviction to bring a civil claim against a negligent owner. The two systems are separate and use different standards. Often it is the owner's insurance that can actually provide compensation for what you have been through.

How we help

We investigate the property's security and history, handle everything confidentially, and pursue accountability with respect for what you have been through. The review is free and confidential. Se habla español.

Frequently asked questions

Can I really sue a property owner for someone else’s crime?

Yes, where the owner should have foreseen the risk and failed to provide reasonable security. The attacker is responsible for the crime, and the owner may share responsibility for allowing a foreseeable danger to go unaddressed.

It happened a while ago. Is it too late?

Maybe not. Deadlines depend on the state and circumstances, and it is worth a confidential conversation before assuming it is too late.

California law — what people ask

How long do I have to file an injury claim in California?

Generally two years from the date you were hurt. If a government entity is involved — a city vehicle, a public road, a public hospital — you usually have to present a formal claim to that agency within roughly six months before you can sue at all, which catches people out far more often than the two-year date.

Can I still recover if I was partly at fault in California?

Yes. California uses pure comparative negligence, so your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault rather than barred — even if your share turns out to be the larger one. There is no cutoff percentage that ends a claim here.

Does California cap what I can recover?

Not in an ordinary injury case. Medical-malpractice claims are the main exception, where non-economic damages are limited by a cap that steps up over time. For most claims — car crashes, falls, defective products — there is no statutory ceiling.

What if more than one person was responsible?

California splits the analysis: defendants can be jointly responsible for your economic losses such as medical bills and lost income, while non-economic damages like pain and suffering are apportioned to each defendant by its own share of fault.

The driver who hit me had no insurance. What now?

Your own uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage is usually the answer, and it commonly applies to hit-and-run collisions as well. Check every policy in the household, not only the one covering the car you were in.

Will the jury hear that my health insurance paid my bills?

Generally not. California follows the collateral source rule, so a wrongdoer does not get credit for insurance you paid for. How your medical damages are measured is a separate and often contested question.

Injury law in California

California injury law shapes your case in a few specific ways worth knowing early.

  • Filing deadline: You generally have two years from the date of the injury to file — and only about six months to put a government entity on notice before you can sue.
  • Fault: California follows pure comparative negligence, so you can still recover even if you were partly — or mostly — at fault, with your recovery reduced by your share of the blame.
  • Damage caps: An ordinary California injury case has no cap on damages; medical-malpractice claims are the main exception.
  • Uninsured drivers: California sets minimum auto-insurance limits and uninsured/underinsured-motorist rules that affect what coverage is available.

This is general information about California injury law, not legal advice. Every case is different.

Harmed by a crime that could have been prevented?

A quick, confidential review can tell you where you stand — about two minutes, no cost, no obligation.

Start your free review