Free, confidential case review — Call (866) 855-1195
Se habla espanolContact
Pedestrian Accidents · New Mexico

Elderly Pedestrian Accident Claims in New Mexico

Older adults are hit crossing streets and in parking lots more often than they should be, and they tend to suffer more serious injuries. Drivers owe every pedestrian the right of way, regardless of how quickly they move.

Serious injuries, real consequences

A crash that a younger person might recover from can cause fractures, head injuries, and long, difficult recoveries for an older adult. A claim should account for that full impact, including extended care needs.

How we help

We document the full extent of the injuries, push back on any argument that the pedestrian was at fault for crossing slowly, and handle the claim. The review is free and confidential. Se habla español.

How much is my pedestrian accident case worth? →

Frequently asked questions

The driver says my elderly parent crossed too slowly. Is that a defense?

Not really. Drivers must yield to pedestrians in a crosswalk regardless of their pace. How fault is weighed depends on the facts, which a review can assess.

New Mexico law — what people ask

How long do I have to file an injury claim in New Mexico?

Generally three years — longer than California or Arizona allow. But if a government entity is involved, the Tort Claims Act requires written notice within 90 days, which is the shortest deadline in New Mexico injury law and can pass while someone is still in hospital.

Can I still recover if I was partly at fault in New Mexico?

Yes. New Mexico follows pure comparative negligence, so your share of fault reduces the recovery rather than barring it, with no cutoff percentage. The rule came from the state’s courts rather than its legislature.

Does New Mexico cap what I can recover?

It depends entirely on who caused the harm, and this is where New Mexico is genuinely different. An ordinary injury claim is not capped. Medical-malpractice claims run into a tiered cap under the Medical Malpractice Act, and claims against government entities run into separate Tort Claims Act limits. Three regimes, three answers.

What if more than one party was responsible?

New Mexico largely does away with joint and several liability, so each defendant is generally responsible for its own share. There are meaningful exceptions — intentional torts, vicarious liability, and products in the stream of commerce among them.

The driver who hit me had no insurance. What now?

This happens more here than in most states. Your own uninsured or underinsured coverage is the route, and New Mexico courts have been comparatively protective of policyholders on stacking — combining the limits of more than one policy or vehicle where premiums were paid for each.

Is a medical claim treated differently in New Mexico?

Substantially. Claims against providers qualified under the Medical Malpractice Act pass through a review commission before suit, are governed by a statute of repose rather than an ordinary limitations period, and are subject to the tiered caps with a compensation fund behind them.

Injury law in New Mexico

New Mexico injury law gives families a longer window and some distinctive rules.

  • Filing deadline: New Mexico gives you longer than most states — generally three years from the injury — with a 90-day notice deadline when a government entity is involved.
  • Fault: New Mexico follows pure comparative negligence, so sharing some of the blame reduces your recovery rather than ending your claim.
  • Damage caps: An ordinary New Mexico injury case is not capped; medical-malpractice and government claims have their own separate limits.
  • Multiple defendants: New Mexico generally applies several liability, with some exceptions.

Related pedestrian accident types

This is general information about New Mexico injury law, not legal advice. Every case is different.

Hurt in a crash you didn't cause?

A quick, confidential review can tell you where you stand — about two minutes, no cost, no obligation.

Start your free review